Sunday, June 13, 2004

Law school to stay in Carlisle


Patriot-News
Copyright (c) 2004 Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved.

Sunday, June 13, 2004


Law school to stay in Carlisle ; Board to consider dual-campus proposal

ELIZABETH GIBSON
Of Our Carlisle Bureau

A plan to move The Dickinson School of Law out of Carlisle ended yesterday. The school's board of governors voted unanimously in a closed- door session to consider building a second, $60 million law campus in State College while upgrading the Carlisle site for about $25 million. That decision is expected to be made by Aug. 15.

"The decision to close Dickinson in Carlisle is off the table. The school is not moving," said Tom Ridge, Homeland Security director and a Dickinson board member, after yesterday's three-hour meeting.

The board meeting had been expected to end with a vote on whether Dickinson would stay in Carlisle or move to State College. Penn State President Graham Spanier changed the agenda when he put a two- campus proposal on the table Friday night.

That followed months of a moving-or-staying debate, during which some of the board's 35 members had lobbied others to reject the proposal to move to State College.

Spanier denied that withdrawing the original proposal was a loss for Penn State.

"It's a plan B that I think turns out to be the best plan," Spanier said.

He also denied charges from many alumni and local officials that despite promises to keep Dickinson in Carlisle, Penn State had planned to move Dickinson to State College since the schools announced their merger in 1997.

"None of us ever contemplated we would be at this point," Spanier said.

Discussions opened up in November to improve the law school or move it because the campus needs renovations and its national ranking has slipped.

Ridge praised the decision to keep the school in Carlisle and said board members would keep an "open mind" as they consider the latest option.

"This is a great law school, both for the education it offers and the opportunities it provides," he said. In the midstate, students have access to county, state and federal courts as well as job opportunities at the many law firms, he said.

The new plan would educate 300 Dickinson students at Trickett Hall in Carlisle and 450 students at a law facility in State College.

The board of governors' meeting was closed to the public, but board members said later that the talks inside Trickett Hall were not heated.

"Lawyers don't necessarily yell and scream. There were long speeches with lots of words filled with emotion," board member Jason Kutulakis said.

He said Ridge did not deliver prepared remarks. "He participated. He asked questions," Kutulakis said.

There was a feeling of celebration after the vote and one of relief that the board and Penn State are "united in going forward with what's best for students," he said.

The Patriot-News and The Sentinel of Carlisle have tried to open board meetings to the public since last fall. The newspapers have asked the state Supreme Court to permit an appeal of a Commonwealth Court decision that allows the board to meet behind closed doors.

Outside the meeting, some board members who opposed a move said they think the new plan is a compromise that can work -- with revisions.

Despite mixed feelings about the importance of national ranking, members said opportunities with a two-campus school could boost Dickinson's third-tier rating. They welcomed a plan that would meet the school's goals without uprooting it, but said they would insist on a guarantee that Dickinson could not be transplanted.

"There'd have to be a lot of safeguards built into the arrangement," board member Hubert X. Gilroy said.

Member Robert M. Frey, who was chairman of Dickinson's trustees when the school merged with Penn State, said he still has questions. But he's sure the campus with the greatest number of students will be perceived as the main campus, he said.

Board Chairman LeRoy Zimmerman said the arrangement would not resemble law schools like Widener University School of Law, which has a branch campus in Harrisburg.

He is to choose board members this week who will study the plan and give a report this summer. But he said it has already been decided that there would be one budget for both schools, which would "take care of the issue of whether [Carlisle] would be a second- class place."

Dean Philip McConnaughay said the two programs would have to be equal to boost rankings. He said Dickinson would be rated using one consolidated report that reflected both schools.

If one campus had fewer resources than the other, "it would sink the ship," he said.

McConnaughay said the 15-to-1 student teacher ratio proposed under the two-campus plan is an improvement over Dickinson's current 19-to-1 ratio.

Gov. Ed Rendell pledged $10 million toward renovating Dickinson's Carlisle campus. That would be matched by $10 million from Penn State. Local grants and financing could raise $5 million or more.

Reporter Joe Elias contributed to this report. ELIZABETH GIBSON: 249- 2006 or egibson@patriot-news.com
TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH IN THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE


PHOTO;FILEART; MICHAEL FERNANDEZ; Caption: Penn State President Graham Spanier described the new proposal as ?plan B.?? (The Associated Press, 2003); Tom Ridge praised the decision to keep The Dickinson School of Law in Carlisle, saying it is ?a great law school.?? (MICHAEL FERNANDEZ, The Patriot-News)

Saturday, June 12, 2004

Law school board considering dual-campus plan


Centre Daily Times
(c) Copyright 2004, Centre Daily Times. All Rights Reserved.

Saturday, June 12, 2004


Law school board considering dual-campus plan

By Gwenn Miller
gmiller3@centredaily.com

CARLISLE The board of governors of Penn State's Dickinson School of Law is considering a new scenario for the law school's future involving one school with campuses both at University Park and Carlisle.

The board was expected to vote today on whether the school will remain in Carlisle -- its home for 170 years -- or move to State College. On Friday, though, Penn State President Graham Spanier said he did not anticipate a vote because board members may want more time to consider the new proposal.

Under the plan, outlined Friday by Spanier and the board's chairman, LeRoy S. Zimmerman, the law school would continue to offer education in Carlisle with additional programs at Penn State's main campus.

"This is going to be in the forefront in legal education nationally," Spanier said.

Board members met Friday night behind closed doors and broke about 10:30 p.m. Gov. Ed Rendell and Penn State board of trustees Chairwoman Cynthia Baldwin were among those at the meeting.

Zimmerman issued a memo to the law school board Thursday in support of the two-campus plan. "I think it's a great proposal, and I have recommended it to the board of governors," he said.

The issue of whether to keep the law school in Carlisle, located about 20 miles west of Harrisburg, has been scrutinized and analyzed since November, when a confidential memo from law school Dean Philip McConnaughay to the board was leaked to the media.

That memo outlined options for the law school's future, including relocating the school to University Park.

"This is a very, very important decision for the board of governors to make, and we've had a lot of information on both sides of the issue," board member Anthony C. Falvello said, "and we need to give it extremely serious consideration before we vote."

The cost of renovating Dickinson's Trickett Hall in Carlisle is estimated at $25 million. Penn State has pledged $10 million, and Rendell has committed an additional $10 million in state funds. The remainder of the cost would be drawn from governmental and community organizations and charitable donations.

Under the new plan, the Carlisle campus would serve about 300 students. About 450 law students would be accommodated at University Park.

Spanier said that Penn State never wanted to completely abandon Carlisle.

"We never took the either-or position," he said.

The new plan, he said, would allow Dickinson students more flexibility than they're offered by the current situation because they would be able to spend semesters at either site.

Memo from LeRoy S. Zimmerman, chairman of the Dickinson law school board of governors


Centre Daily Times
(c) Copyright 2004, Centre Daily Times. All Rights Reserved.

Saturday, June 12, 2004


Memo from LeRoy S. Zimmerman, chairman of the Dickinson law school board of governors

June 10, 2004 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL

To: Board of Governors From: LeRoy S. Zimmerman

Re: Two Campus Proposal

I have been wrestling for several days now, as I am sure many of you have, with the question of whether there might be a solution to the issues our Law School confronts that we have not yet considered. Clearly, the current proposals by the University, though generous and well-intended, have divided our Board. Consequently, I have been in touch with Penn State Board of Trustees Chair Cynthia Baldwin, Penn State President Graham Spanier, and Dean Phil McConnaughay, to consider whether the Dickinson School of Law might operate one fully accredited Law School with integrated and complementary J.D. programs at two separately located campuses, one at our historic location in Carlisle and another on the campus at University Park. This would give our students the extraordinary opportunity to enjoy the benefits of programmatic integration with the opportunity to learn and develop their practice skills.

Yesterday, President Spanier and Dean McConnaughay and I met for several hours to discuss the merits and terms of such an option. President Spanier spoke with Governor Rendell about the possibility, as well as with the leadership of the Penn State Board of Trustees. These discussions culminated in a new formal proposal from the University regarding a two-campus alternative, which I received from President Spanier today. I am pleased to enclose the proposal for your review.

Sometimes the pressure of division results in a favorable solution. I believe this is such an occasion. To quote a former academic, Father Theodore Hesburgh, "my basic principle is that you don't make decisions because they are easy; you don't make them because they are cheap; you don't make them because they're popular; you make them because they're right." I support the University's new proposal and it is my hope that all of you will join me in supporting this creative solution to the challenges to our Law School.

I look forward to discussing this with you at our meeting. I have asked President Spanier and Board of Trustees Chair Cynthia Baldwin to be present for our discussions, and they have agreed to join us. Finally, I would like to report that Governor Rendell has encouraged our efforts to come up with a workable solution, and he too plans to join us Friday evening to share his thoughts.

Penn State proposes 2 campuses for school ; Dickinson board to study last-minute deal ---- Death by cuts


Patriot-News
Copyright (c) 2004 Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved.

Saturday, June 12, 2004


Penn State proposes 2 campuses for school ; Dickinson board to study last-minute deal

ELIZABETH GIBSON
Of Our Carlisle Bureau

Just as members of The Dickinson School of Law's governors board were ready to say whether the school should be rebuilt in Carlisle or move to State College, Penn State President Graham Spanier suggested they do both. In a surprising last-minute offer, Spanier gave the board a proposal for a two-campus operation. He said it would be the nation's first unified law school with two locations.

Spanier said the proposal was put together just days ago, but promises to be ground-breaking.

"This is going to be on the forefront of legal education nationally," Spanier said.

The idea of a dual campus had surfaced earlier but that plan called for the main law campus and student body to be in State College and a public law center that would cater more to local and state officials to be housed in Carlisle.

Gov. Ed Rendell joined Spanier in presenting the plan to the board yesterday, and Rendell pledged $10 million toward a renovation of Dickinson's Carlisle campus.

Ten million dollars in state money, $10 million from Penn State and $5 million gained through locally sponsored grants and donations would be used to renovate Carlisle's Trickett Hall to house 300 students, 20 professors and a full program enhanced by continued public law internships.

University Park would get a $60 million law school facility that would hold 450 students, 30 faculty and a law program that would highlight chances for students to specialize their law degree in business, finance, science and other areas.

Both campuses would be equipped with the latest technology for interaction, thereby rendering the distance between the campuses insignificant, Spanier said.

Students would have the chance to split their study time between Carlisle and State College, he said.

Board Chairman LeRoy Zimmerman said he would urge his board to support the proposal.

"I think they're very interested in it," Zimmerman said.

He said the board has a lot of questions about how faculty, administrators and other law school resources would be shared between the two campuses. No member has dismissed the proposal, he said.

"There are many issues that need to be threaded through," Zimmerman said.

As a result of the development, the board won't be ready to make a decision on the proposal today, he said.

Nearly every board member, including Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge, was expected to attend the board's meeting today.

But, instead of casting a landmark vote as had been expected, members will begin to sift through the pros and cons of a two- campus school.

The proposal would set aside seven months of local furor over the possibility of losing the law school to State College.

It could also bring to an end academic arguments over whether law students benefit more from the plentiful internship opportunities they get in and around Carlisle than they would from being exposed to many new areas of research and study on a large university campus.

"I think it's a win-win in every aspect," Zimmerman said.

"It's almost historic in terms of the opportunities it presents," said Dickinson Dean Philip McConnaughay.

"It will be of enormous benefit to our law school, our students and our community," he said.

Friday, June 11, 2004

'Close vote' expected on Dickinson


Patriot-News
Copyright (c) 2004 Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved.

Friday, June 11, 2004


'Close vote' expected on Dickinson ; Board meets on proposal to move law school

ELIZABETH GIBSON
Of Our Carlisle Bureau

LeRoy Zimmerman will open historic talks tonight that will determine the future home of The Dickinson School of Law. He said he is certain of one thing: The 35 people deciding whether Dickinson should stay in Carlisle or move to State College could spend a lot of time arguing. The board will make a decision tomorrow and announce it by noon.

"I have a sense it's going to be a close vote," he said.

Zimmerman, chairman of Dickinson's board of governors, said the group will hear from faculty today before talks begin at 6:30 p.m.

A law school spokeswoman said it was unclear if board member Tom Ridge, national Homeland Security secretary, and Lewis Katz, owner of the New Jersey Nets, will attend, although they will vote.

Members can vote by telephone, board member Hubert X. Gilroy said.

With nearly a third of the board, including Gilroy, composed of midstate lawyers, the debate is likely to feature arguments for maintaining Dickinson's home in Carlisle.

The Harrisburg Regional Chamber & Capital Region Economic Development Corp. this week called for the board to keep Dickinson in Carlisle.

Penn State, Dickinson's parent institution, pledged to build the school a $60 million facility at University Park. Dickinson Dean Philip McConnaughay said the board should take the offer because a move to the large research university would improve academic offerings and boost Dickinson's rankings.

Gilroy said he'll vote to keep Dickinson in Carlisle, but not because of sentiment.

"I do not fault the [Penn State] administration for seeking to relocate Dickinson to [State College]. Such a maneuver may enhance the overall reputation of Penn State University," Gilroy said.

But board members have to decide what's best for Dickinson, not Penn State, he said.

Gilroy said a Dickinson committee formed last year to study ways to boost the school's rankings didn't suggest moving the school. It recommended lowering tuition, reducing class size and doing a better job of promoting Dickinson to attract top students.

"I really believe the board members are going to do the best thing for the students. That's their polestar," board member Zygmunt Bialkowski said.

Jan Murphy contributed to this report. ELIZABETH GIBSON: 249-2006 or egibson@patriot-news.com
TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH IN THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE


FILEART; DAN GLEITER; Caption: Dickinson School of Law students Rene Gornall, left, and Sarah Jolly study in the school's law library in Carlisle. Dickinson Law's board of governors will decide this weekend whether to keep the school in Carlisle or move it to State College.; A decision on whether to move The Dickinson School of Law to State College is to be announced by noon tomorrow.

Thursday, June 10, 2004

Ethics of law-school proposal


Centre Daily Times
(c) Copyright 2004, Centre Daily Times. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, June 10, 2004

Your Letters; Ethics of law-school proposal

Penn State President Graham Spanier is intent on moving the Dickinson School of Law to State College. The agreement under which Penn State purchased the Dickinson School of Law clearly stated the intent for it to remain in Carlisle.

However, Spanier has announced his interpretation that it is legally OK to move the school.

He proposes that the clearly stated intent to remain in Carlisle be supplanted by legalistic hair splitting. That proposal would make a fascinating and timely case study in professional and academic ethics that should be immediately incorporated into the Dickinson curriculum.

Has Spanier considered the message his current campaign sends to future lawyers: that it is OK to subvert agreements and contracts; that legalistic maneuvering counts more than principle?

The benefits of moving the Detroit School of Law to the Michigan State campus have been cited to support the Dickinson move. However, the Detroit School of Law was an academic foundling that had been thrown out of its home and needed to be taken in.

The attempt to move the Dickinson School of Law to State College is more akin to a kidnapping.

The Dickinson School of Law's facilities need upgrading, but the school does not require a vast campus. Spanier could put more effort into upgrading academics and looking for local solutions to facility problems. For example, renovation or reconstruction of current facilities could be coupled with expansion into the nearby site soon to be vacated by Carlisle Regional Medical Center.

Spanier may feel that moving the school to State College would be an academic feather in his cap, his legacy to the school. In fact, living up to the spirit (not just the legalistic letter) of his predecessors' agreement would leave a far more meaningful legacy of ethical conduct and integrity.

Cloyd GatrellCarlisle

Interest runs high in vote to settle Dickinson's fate


Centre Daily Times
(c) Copyright 2004, Centre Daily Times. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, June 10, 2004


Interest runs high in vote to settle Dickinson's fate

By Gwenn Miller
gmiller3@centredaily.com

A controversy that began with a memorandum leaked to the media and followed by months of debate will culminate Saturday when the Penn State Dickinson School of Law's board of governors decides whether to move the school from Carlisle to University Park. The board has been discussing the law school's future, including relocation, for several months. The issue became public in November after a confidential memorandum from law school Dean Philip McConnaughay was shared with the press. The memo suggested ways to address the concerns about the school's outdated physical plant, including moving the school to University Park.

The ensuing months brought a multitude of memos and passionate arguments by those for and against the move. Vocal board members have outlined various concerns, including a lack of professional experience for students if the law school were to relocate to State College. Others have said a move from Carlisle represents a violation of the merger agreement negotiated between Penn State and Dickinson in 2000.

Penn State administrators, however, have promised $60 million for a new law school building at University Park and other financial incentives to recruit faculty should the board opt for co-location. Should the board decide to remain in Carlisle, Penn State would commit $10 million for renovation and expansion.

After months of listening and lobbying, board members are expected to vote Saturday morning at Trickett Hall in Carlisle. Board Chairman LeRoy Zimmerman said he and his colleagues have heard from all interested parties, including the Carlisle community, alumni and students, and are ready to make a decision.

"I think that most board members feel we have more than enough information," Zimmerman said.

The decision-makers Whatever happens Saturday, Zimmerman said he senses the vote will be close.

Zimmerman said he has not polled the board and, as its leader, has tried to stay above the fray.

"I have said consistently that the board of governors does not owe a fiduciary duty to anyone except the institution of the law school, and its students today and its future students," Zimmerman said. "That's where our responsibility is and that's where we must focus."

Some board members were more vocal than others throughout the last seven months. Carlisle attorney and board member Hubert Gilroy wrote an eight-page memo to the board outlining the reasons he will vote to keep the school in its present location. Gilroy said there is no doubt that existing facilities need to be renovated, but said relocation to State College "is not required, nor is it advisable."

Camp Hill attorney and board member G. Thomas Miller also advocates staying in Carlisle. He said he doesn't foresee any drastic improvements in its rankings if the school moves to University Park.

"I think the students will have many more opportunities at the broader aspects of legal education, both academic and practical, especially practical (in Carlisle), than they would at University Park," Miller said.

Of the board members the Centre Daily Times was able to reach, several declined to comment.

Carlisle attorney Jason Kutulakis said he did not want to reveal his vote, but said he and his fellow board members are aware of the impact their votes will have on thousands of students for hundreds of years.

"I think the board is resolved to go forward and build a new structure, whether it's in Carlisle or University Park, and that's exciting," Kutulakis said. "And that's the message that needs to be sent to everyone."

Government leaders Government reaction to the November memo has ranged from vitriolic to diplomatic.

After chastising Spanier at Penn State's February appropriations hearings, Rep. John Maher, R-Allegheny, proposed an amendment to the university's funding in order to keep the law school in Carlisle.

Sen. Hal Mowery, R-Lemoyne, spoke to the board in May and outlined reasons for keeping the school at its current location, including the possibility for expansion in Carlisle. Mowery also announced that Gov. Ed Rendell will release $25 million of matching funds for the law school to stay in Carlisle, pending the approval of the state budget.

Carlisle officials and community members say the borough would take a huge financial hit if the board votes to move. Borough Manager Fred Bean said Tuesday that the community is nervous, and hopeful the vote will go its way.

"Hopefully, we've made the best case we can to keep the law school in Carlisle," Bean said.

Sen. Jake Corman, R-Bellefonte, said he hopes the board does what is in the best interests of the law school and its future students.

"That should be the driving issue of where you locate it and any decisions you make," Corman said.

State College Mayor Bill Welch said he would be delighted to have the law school at University Park.

"I think it would benefit campus and community and most importantly, present and future students at the Dickinson School of Law," Welch said.

Faculty and students James B. Thomas, dean of the School of Information Sciences and Technology, and Judy Olian, dean of the Smeal College of Business Administration, each said co-location will provide numerous opportunities for collaboration between University Park faculty and law students. Students will also have the opportunity to earn joint degrees, such as a J.D. and an MBA.

"There's so many synergies and points of intersection between business and law," Olian said.

Carlos Ball, professor of law at Dickinson, agreed, saying relocation is a wonderful opportunity for students to interact with faculty at University Park and improve the law school's national reputation.

While moving would represent a major change for future students, several University Park students interviewed said they don't see it affecting them.

Junior Wendy Zhu, however, said having the law school on campus would make a difference in her plans. A chemical engineering major, Zhu said she would take law classes because she is interested in pursuing a career in intellectual property and patent law.

Patrick Stafford, a senior majoring in engineering, said he is also considering a law career.

"I think it would probably be a good idea to bring it closer," Stafford said.

Resident's View : Is moving law school the best option? - Questions Spanier's integrity and ethics


Centre Daily Times
(c) Copyright 2004, Centre Daily Times. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, June 10, 2004

My View Is moving law school the best option?

By Anne G. Miller

The Greater Harrisburg/Carlisle economic, academic and legislative groups as well as members of the law school governing board have spoken out and mobilized forces to oppose the move of Dickinson School of Law to State College. The local newspapers have also tried to keep the public aware of the tactics Penn State President Graham Spanier and Dickinson Dean Philip McConnaughay have exercised with the hope of convincing Dickinson's board of governors to authorize the move.

The board is expected to consider the matter this weekend and vote on Saturday.

It is puzzling, however, that we have heard nothing as to the reactions of the State College community or the Penn State Board of Trustees. It is highly unlikely that Spanier would continue to "sweeten the pot" without the tacit approval of his board.

If silence bids consent, we can assume that the Penn State board also disregards: the intent of the merger and the ethical responsibility to abide by it; the opposition opinion of alumni, community, DSL applicants and supporters, including the governor; and the adverse impact on the Carlisle community, which has supported this tax-exempt institution since its inception 170 years ago.

What about the State College taxpayers? Do they support Penn State's uncontrolled growth and the accompanying impact on the environment and the infrastructure? Are their natural resources unlimited and owned by Penn State?

I think water supply could also be an issue in the State College area.

Water availability and pollution are in direct proportion to the number of sources using it: more buildings, more roads, more run-off, more kids, more effluent, more pollution and loss at taxpayers' expense.

Spanier apparently has countless sources of money.

Does he also have unlimited access to the myriad state and local permits attendant to the construction of his Taj Mahal ($60 million) law school in University Park?

In addition to the infrastructure required for the "world-class" law school promised by Spanier, can the State College community support the additional students and their accompanying needs for housing, parking, schools, employment, health care and other services?

Are the economy and loyalty of the State College taxpayers dependent on the university to the degree that adverse criticism or action is prohibited?

It is a sad commentary when "little money, little law" controls. Is it acceptable for those entrusted with articulating and enforcing high ethical standards to ignore all of the foregoing factors in their dealings?

This is especially egregious when a law school, the training ground for future defenders of the law, is at stake.

Spanier was a party to the merger and knows the intent of the merger, which was to support and enhance Dickinson's stature at the Carlisle location that has served its students with great success for many years.

Is the president of this tax-exempt institution also exempt from ethical commitment and integrity?

Anne G. Miller is a resident of Dillsburg.

DICKINSON DECISION EXPECTED SOON


Centre Daily Times
(c) Copyright 2004, Centre Daily Times. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, June 10, 2004

DICKINSON DECISION EXPECTED SOON

A controversy that began with a memorandum leaked to the media and followed by months of debate will culminate Saturday when the Penn State Dickinson School of Law's board of governors decides whether to move the school from Carlisle to University Park. The board has been discussing the law school's future, including relocation, for several months. The issue became public in November after a confidential memorandum from law school Dean Philip McConnaughay was shared with the press. The memo suggested ways to address the concerns about the school's outdated physical plant, including moving the school to University Park.

Dickinson Q&A


Centre Daily Times
(c) Copyright 2004, Centre Daily Times. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, June 10, 2004


Dickinson Q&A

Q: Why is the Dickinson School of Law's board of governors considering moving the law school? A: The school's facilities are in need of renovation and the school needs room to expand, and it has so far found it difficult to raise the money to pay for an expansion. Law school Dean Philip McConnaughay worries that the school's rankings have fallen, and that it no longer is able to easily attract top-flight students.

Q: What are the arguments for and against moving the school to Penn State's University Park campus?

A: McConnaughay and Penn State President Graham Spanier say the advantage is the opportunity for collaboration with other schools and colleges -- for example, a small business entrepreneurship law clinic in conjunction with the business school -- that will offer more opportunities and better prepare students for the work they will do when they graduate.

Opponents of the move say the community of Carlisle, home to the law school since it was founded 160 years ago, would be hurt economically. They also argue that the law school, located near Harrisburg and not far from Washington, D.C., provides vast opportunities for internships and externships not available in State College.

Q: What will happen next if the board of governors votes Saturday to move the school?

A: Penn State has pledged to build a $60 million facility to house the school on or near the University Park campus. That facility could open in 2008, university officials say.

Q: Does that mean the student population of University Park would be pushed above the cap of 42,000 the university imposed because of concerns about the effect too many students would have on the community?

A: No. The law school has about 650 students, and Spanier has said the university would maintain that enrollment cap by reducing enrollment in other programs.

Q: What would happen to the school facilities in Carlisle if a move is approved?

A: Spanier and McConnaughay say the facilities could be renovated to house law school programs, such as a center for continuing and executive education or a government center.

Board to Decide Future of Carlisle, Pa., Law School


Centre Daily Times (KRTBN)
Copyright (C) 2004 KRTBN Knight Ridder Tribune Business News

Thursday, June 10, 2004

Board to Decide Future of Carlisle, Pa., Law School

By Gwenn Miller, Centre Daily Times, State College, Pa.
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News

Jun. 10--A controversy that began with a memorandum leaked to the media and followed by months of debate will culminate Saturday when the Penn State Dickinson School of Law's board of governors decides whether to move the school from Carlisle to University Park. The board has been discussing the law school's future, including relocation, for several months. The issue became public in November after a confidential memorandum from law school Dean Philip McConnaughay was shared with the press. The memo suggested ways to address the concerns about the school's outdated physical plant, including moving the school to University Park.

The ensuing months brought a multitude of memos and passionate arguments by those for and against the move. Vocal board members have outlined various concerns, including a lack of professional experience for students if the law school were to relocate to State College. Others have said a move from Carlisle represents a violation of the merger agreement negotiated between Penn State and Dickinson in 2000.

Penn State administrators, however, have promised $60 million for a new law school building at University Park and other financial incentives to recruit faculty should the board opt for co-location. Should the board decide to remain in Carlisle, Penn State would commit $10 million for renovation and expansion.

After months of listening and lobbying, board members are expected to vote Saturday morning at Trickett Hall in Carlisle. Board Chairman LeRoy Zimmerman said he and his colleagues have heard from all interested parties, including the Carlisle community, alumni and students, and are ready to make a decision.

"I think that most board members feel we have more than enough information," Zimmerman said.

Whatever happens Saturday, Zimmerman said he senses the vote will be close.

Zimmerman said he has not polled the board and, as its leader, has tried to stay above the fray.

"I have said consistently that the board of governors does not owe a fiduciary duty to anyone except the institution of the law school, and its students today and its future students," Zimmerman said. "That's where our responsibility is and that's where we must focus."

Some board members were more vocal than others throughout the last seven months. Carlisle attorney and board member Hubert Gilroy wrote an eight- page memo to the board outlining the reasons he will vote to keep the school in its present location. Gilroy said there is no doubt that existing facilities need to be renovated, but said relocation to State College "is not required, nor is it advisable."

Camp Hill attorney and board member G. Thomas Miller also advocates staying in Carlisle. He said he doesn't foresee any drastic improvements in its rankings if the school moves to University Park.

"I think the students will have many more opportunities at the broader aspects of legal education, both academic and practical, especially practical (in Carlisle), than they would at University Park," Miller said.

Of the board members the Centre Daily Times was able to reach, several declined to comment.

Carlisle attorney Jason Kutulakis said he did not want to reveal his vote, but said he and his fellow board members are aware of the impact their votes will have on thousands of students for hundreds of years.

"I think the board is resolved to go forward and build a new structure, whether it's in Carlisle or University Park, and that's exciting," Kutulakis said. "And that's the message that needs to be sent to everyone." Government leaders Government reaction to the November memo has ranged from vitriolic to diplomatic.

After chastising Spanier at Penn State's February appropriations hearings, Rep. John Maher, R-Allegheny, proposed an amendment to the university's funding in order to keep the law school in Carlisle.

Sen. Hal Mowery, R-Lemoyne, spoke to the board in May and outlined reasons for keeping the school at its current location, including the possibility for expansion in Carlisle. Mowery also announced that Gov.

Ed Rendell will release $25 million of matching funds for the law school to stay in Carlisle, pending the approval of the state budget.

Carlisle officials and community members say the borough would take a huge financial hit if the board votes to move. Borough Manager Fred Bean said Tuesday that the community is nervous, and hopeful the vote will go its way.

"Hopefully, we've made the best case we can to keep the law school in Carlisle," Bean said.

Sen. Jake Corman, R-Bellefonte, said he hopes the board does what is in the best interests of the law school and its future students.

"That should be the driving issue of where you locate it and any decisions you make," Corman said.

State College Mayor Bill Welch said he would be delighted to have the law school at University Park.

"I think it would benefit campus and community and most importantly, present and future students at the Dickinson School of Law," Welch said.

Faculty and students James B. Thomas, dean of the School of Information Sciences and Technology, and Judy Olian, dean of the Smeal College of Business Administration, each said co-location will provide numerous opportunities for collaboration between University Park faculty and law students.

Students will also have the opportunity to earn joint degrees, such as a J.D. and an MBA.

"There's so many synergies and points of intersection between business and law," Olian said.

Carlos Ball, professor of law at Dickinson, agreed, saying relocation is a wonderful opportunity for students to interact with faculty at University Park and improve the law school's national reputation.

While moving would represent a major change for future students, several University Park students interviewed said they don't see it affecting them.

Junior Wendy Zhu, however, said having the law school on campus would make a difference in her plans. A chemical engineering major, Zhu said she would take law classes because she is interested in pursuing a career in intellectual property and patent law.

Patrick Stafford, a senior majoring in engineering, said he is also considering a law career.

"I think it would probably be a good idea to bring it closer," Stafford said.

Tuesday, June 08, 2004

Board ready to decide fate of law school


Patriot-News
Copyright (c) 2004 Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, June 8, 2004


Board ready to decide fate of law school

ELIZABETH GIBSON
Of Our Carlisle Bureau

Nathan Waters is ready to vote. For the last four months, he and other members of The Dickinson School of Law board of governors have listened to constituents, and weighed concrete offers and counteroffers and not-so-tangible pros and cons.

?" can't stand any more information. I have looked at all that I'm going to look at," said Waters, a former trustee.

This weekend, the board will make its decision: Will the law school retain its 170-year home in Carlisle? Or will it establish a base with its parent organization, Penn State University, and move to State College?

The decision -- like the discussion -- will likely be lively, spirited and split.

?They've set aside a lot of time. I expect there will be a lot of debate,?? said board member and former trustee Anthony C. Falvello of Sugarloaf.

The board will meet Friday night and Saturday morning, then vote. Saturday's meeting will be only the fourth the board has held since November, when it received the proposal to replace Dickinson's aging buildings with a $60 million facility at Penn State.

From the onset, the proposal has caused division.

Scranton attorney Zygmunt Bialkowski Jr., a board member, said the money that Penn State has promised for a State College facility appears guaranteed, making the idea of moving more attractive.

"I don't want to see a [Carlisle] project get started and halfway through the project you don't have the money to finish it," he said.

Law school and university officials feared that board members who live near Dickinson would bend to local pressure to keep the school in Carlisle or allow personal feelings to color their decisions.

Board member Hubert X. Gilroy, who lives across the street from Dickinson, said that hasn't been the case.

Gilroy said he originally considered voting in favor of relocation but that the $25 million pledged from the commonwealth leveled the playing field.

"I frankly determined that if the only way we could get the money was to relocate to Penn State, I envisioned [making] a very difficult decision for me, personally," he said.

Law school Dean Philip McConnaughay has argued that a move to State College would improve Dickinson's national rankings.

Board member Jason Kutulakis of Carlisle said the Newtown-based Law School Admission Council, which administers the Law School Admission Test, and other law school advocacy agencies scorn rankings.

"Our office believes rankings are totally invalid," said Carl Monk, executive vice president and executive director of the American Association of Law Schools.

For some, the debate comes down to internships vs. academic opportunities.

Dickinson alumni claim internships available in the area often lead to permanent jobs and can't be duplicated in State College.

McConnaughay, on the other hand, claims those internships are overrated. He has said large Pennsylvania firms have become less interested in hiring Dickinson graduates.

Bruce Ficken, a partner in the Philadelphia office of Pepper Hamilton, a firm with 400 lawyers and offices in five states, said firms such as his continue to recruit at Dickinson.

"You will see Dickinson grads at the highest levels of those firms," said Ficken, a 1973 Dickinson graduate.

Board members said no certain setting can guarantee Dickinson's success.

"It's going to boil down to a philosophical decision," Bialkowski said. "In terms of the heritage of the law school, to me, the biggest heritage is the reputation of The Dickinson School of Law, not its location."

Still, every board member is a Dickinson graduate and each can recall time in Carlisle. Some said they never imagined having to decide whether to pull up the school's roots.

"It's something I think about a lot. I hope we make the right decision," Falvello said.

Sunday, June 06, 2004

Our View Dickinson board must look beyond politics, emotions


Centre Daily Times
(c) Copyright 2004, Centre Daily Times. All Rights Reserved.

Sunday, June 6, 2004


Our View Dickinson board must look beyond politics, emotions

Penn State officials have put forth their reasons for wanting to move The Dickinson School of Law from Carlisle to State College. Business leaders and community members in Cumberland County have offered their concerns about what such a move would do to their region and have said that the best thing for the law school and its students would be to remain in Carlisle. Sorting through the statements, rhetoric and impassioned pleas is the job of the Dickinson board of governors. By Saturday, we should know their decision.

Penn State should move forward and make that decision work for the law school and the university as a whole.

As you read on these pages last Sunday and Monday, Penn State officials think a return to glory for Dickinson can be best accomplished by a move to State College.

Penn State President Graham Spanier and Dickinson Dean Philip McConnaughay said in a meeting with the Centre Daily Times editorial board that "co-location," having the law school situated on the university's main campus, would help attract top-notch faculty and prospective students and would allow for shared research and teaching opportunities between the law school and other university departments.

Penn State has proposed building a new $60 million law school at University Park, and also putting several million into the facilities at Carlisle. Penn State would create in Carlisle an executive-education center for individuals who come from the professional ranks, or short-term programs for students spending perhaps a semester there while doing the bulk of their work in State College.

Political and community leaders in the Carlisle area have countered that investing more money in the current location rather than moving the law school would allow Penn State to achieve its goals for improving programs and recruiting students and faculty. They also say that Carlisle's proximity to Harrisburg and state government, and Washington, D.C., and federal government, give that area a distinct advantage over Centre County.

State Sen. Harold F. Mowery, R-Lemoyne, has provided one of the louder voices in opposition to the proposed law school move.

Mowery said investing in Carlisle rather than building a new school at University Park would allow Penn State to control costs and, by extension, minimize the impact on tuition, already expected to jump by about 4 percent next year.

"There are pluses and minuses on both sides," Mowery said. "I like Penn State. I enjoy their football team. I had an insurance agency in State College some years ago, and I like the community. But I just feel that the money that would be spent to build a signature building ... there's just not a strong enough reason to do it."

While Penn State's logic for pursuing the move is sound, neither Spanier nor McConnaughay offered proof that their goals couldn't also be achieved by increasing economic and academic support for Dickinson in Carlisle.
But Mowery and others have no counterargument for the contention that linking Dickinson geographically with main campus would improve learning opportunities for students and also provide for shared research opportunities for faculty. They pointed to Penn State's world-class distance-learning programs, saying technology could accomplish the link without moving the school.

And much of the argument against moving the law school has been generated from an emotional attachment to the current site. Dickinson is one of the oldest law schools in the country and has been a fixture in Carlisle, therefore it should stay there, supporters say. And that position fails to address programmatic needs Dickinson clearly has, including cramped and outdated facilities and dropping rankings compared with other law schools.

"Everybody has really come together as a result of this issue," Mowery said. "The result, whichever way it works out, is that we'll have better educational opportunities in part because we've discussed it -- with one provision, which is that the law school should remain in Carlisle."

So where does that leave the board of governors? With a tough decision that is complex and both emotionally and politically charged.

We urge the members of that board to come together Friday and Saturday with the goal of reaching the best decision.

They must see through the emotions and the politics. They must consider economic impact. And they must, most of all, consider the academic impact of both scenarios -- leaving the law school in Carlisle or moving it north.

In the end, the members of the board of governors must decide with their minds, not their hearts, which option is in the best interest of the education of future law students in the Penn State system and which option will provide the best long-term stability and opportunities for the law school overall.

And when they emerge with a decision, Penn State must be committed to living with that outcome and doing everything possible -- financially and programmatically -- to make it work.

"This is the moment for an important decision," Spanier said, "and we really hope that we can look forward 20, 40, 60 or 100 years and think about the legacy they will leave and what is the right thing to do for the thousands and thousands of graduates who will move through that law school in the future."

"I'm happy that by the 12th, we'll have a decision," Mowery said. "Thank goodness there's light at the end of this tunnel."